What's The Blog About, Alfie?

We are avid fans of literature, good literature. We prefer great writing, we'll settle for very good work, but we cannot abide anything less. We will stop reading a book if the author demonstrates mediocrity, writes incompetently, or, worse yet, simply loses our interest. That said, we will always give you our honest opinions about the books we've listened to on Podiobooks.com. We'll tell you why the great ones are great, and why the forgettable ones should be avoided.

We hope, when we've reviewed enough, you will come to this blog to see if a particular book is worthy of your time. We plan to be frank. You have come here to elicit our opinion and we shall not disappoint. Additionally, we hope this blog becomes a resource for PB.com authors to read honest and objective reviews of their efforts; no smoke blown-up the butt at any time. We have observed over time that reviews left on an author's site or iTunes are basically of two types. The first is the pie-eyed-hyperbolic-praise version of a review by a real fan. While excellent for the ego of said author, this form of assessment aids neither the potential listener nor the writer's development. The second type is the snarky-hit-and-run-slap-in-the-face negative review which may contain the kernel of an insight, but is actually significantly less valuable than the first type. Ours will be decidedly neither polar extreme. We will be as fair and complete as possible. An unavoidable off-shoot, indeed a desirable off-shoot, the clever reader will quickly appreciate is that we will undoubtably be squewering a few sacred-cows. If that happens, please keep in mind the fable of The Emporer's New Clothes and the fact that we would not review them in a less-than-stellar manner if they did not deserve it.

Our reviews are not placed on PB.com, iTunes, or any other public site. We do not wish to embarrass or ridicule any particular authors. Many of the authors are our friends, or at least were up till they read our review. We dearly appreciate that each PB.com author has poured their creative guts out for all to see with very little chance of monetary reward. This is not easy. We will not generally say anything but positives on public sites as we, in our alter ego, want the authors, even the poor ones, to have their moment in the bright-shiny sun. At the very least we want them to be happy little fish in their little ponds.

Finally a term defined, a dreaded term, one you wish never to see, one which strikes despair in the heart of any author - WSRH. This is short for "We Stopped Reading Here". Background. Our less than sainted father was a college English professor. When grading essays and term papers, especially freshman courses, we observed him many a cruel time to slash across the page with his red pen. Just below the horrific line, he would write, "I stopped reading here... F." Clearly, papa was a professor, not an editor, so he was an I while we are, well, a we. Hence, ISRH transforms into WSRH. However you begin it, it is not a good thing. Avoid writing something which earns WSRH, you will not be happy with yourself.

Your comments on our comments are most welcome. You may be as frank as we are. Contrary opinions, supported by rational argument not finger-wagging, will help the prospective PB.com readers find the books which are right for them. Bottom line: our comments plus your comments, along with author rebuttals, will in the end benefit us all, and help PB.com listeners choose wisely.

Based on the success of this blog, we have started a Forum where you can share your insights and reviews. The more information and discussion, the better informed we will all be.

Monday, May 27, 2013

Every Picture Tells a Story, Volume 4 - Underexposed Film

  Every Picture Tells a Story, Volume 4 is offered to us via the combined efforts of Katerina and Mick Bordet.  We assume, but have not read, that Volumes 1-3 are out there somewhere.  The Bordets apparently post a photo and have followers write a short story based on this image.  An intriguing concept, but as we quickly found out, a concept whose success depends wholly on the skill of the contributors.  We only listened to the first short story, titled Digby the Travelogue, and we were most unimpressed.  We reasoned that the lead story would be a strong one, so when it was unacceptable, WSRH.  Rash and over-reactive of us?  Perchance, but after we read a tale which is irritatingly bad, it leaves us feeling off.  The influence of a poor story is akin to how we feel after we've eaten WAY to much pizza an are over-full yet full of regrets for the over-consumption.  Yeah, lousy fiction has that effect.  So, while we could have listen to more, we literally did not wish to risk it.  What was wrong with Digby?  It violated a scared rule of story telling.  Remember from school, that a story consists of various elements.  One outline defines exposition (plot), rising action, conflict, climax, and then resolution?  Well, Digby lacks plot, climax, and resolution.  It just ... ends.  No tale is told, no moral learned, not episode cataloged.  It is not a short story, it is a short thought.  We smell in Digby one of the oldest failures a writer falls into, that of having a really cool idea, but no point to make with it and no ending to be found with it.  Listening to Digby emoted from us the expression, "Not in my house!"
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)