What's The Blog About, Alfie?

We are avid fans of literature, good literature. We prefer great writing, we'll settle for very good work, but we cannot abide anything less. We will stop reading a book if the author demonstrates mediocrity, writes incompetently, or, worse yet, simply loses our interest. That said, we will always give you our honest opinions about the books we've listened to on Podiobooks.com. We'll tell you why the great ones are great, and why the forgettable ones should be avoided.

We hope, when we've reviewed enough, you will come to this blog to see if a particular book is worthy of your time. We plan to be frank. You have come here to elicit our opinion and we shall not disappoint. Additionally, we hope this blog becomes a resource for PB.com authors to read honest and objective reviews of their efforts; no smoke blown-up the butt at any time. We have observed over time that reviews left on an author's site or iTunes are basically of two types. The first is the pie-eyed-hyperbolic-praise version of a review by a real fan. While excellent for the ego of said author, this form of assessment aids neither the potential listener nor the writer's development. The second type is the snarky-hit-and-run-slap-in-the-face negative review which may contain the kernel of an insight, but is actually significantly less valuable than the first type. Ours will be decidedly neither polar extreme. We will be as fair and complete as possible. An unavoidable off-shoot, indeed a desirable off-shoot, the clever reader will quickly appreciate is that we will undoubtably be squewering a few sacred-cows. If that happens, please keep in mind the fable of The Emporer's New Clothes and the fact that we would not review them in a less-than-stellar manner if they did not deserve it.

Our reviews are not placed on PB.com, iTunes, or any other public site. We do not wish to embarrass or ridicule any particular authors. Many of the authors are our friends, or at least were up till they read our review. We dearly appreciate that each PB.com author has poured their creative guts out for all to see with very little chance of monetary reward. This is not easy. We will not generally say anything but positives on public sites as we, in our alter ego, want the authors, even the poor ones, to have their moment in the bright-shiny sun. At the very least we want them to be happy little fish in their little ponds.

Finally a term defined, a dreaded term, one you wish never to see, one which strikes despair in the heart of any author - WSRH. This is short for "We Stopped Reading Here". Background. Our less than sainted father was a college English professor. When grading essays and term papers, especially freshman courses, we observed him many a cruel time to slash across the page with his red pen. Just below the horrific line, he would write, "I stopped reading here... F." Clearly, papa was a professor, not an editor, so he was an I while we are, well, a we. Hence, ISRH transforms into WSRH. However you begin it, it is not a good thing. Avoid writing something which earns WSRH, you will not be happy with yourself.

Your comments on our comments are most welcome. You may be as frank as we are. Contrary opinions, supported by rational argument not finger-wagging, will help the prospective PB.com readers find the books which are right for them. Bottom line: our comments plus your comments, along with author rebuttals, will in the end benefit us all, and help PB.com listeners choose wisely.

Based on the success of this blog, we have started a Forum where you can share your insights and reviews. The more information and discussion, the better informed we will all be.

Friday, March 29, 2013

Tincture - Laced With Goodness!




Okay, my minions, we are proud to do a review.  What pleases us most, and the reason we must make such a show of it, is that there have been so few PB.com entrants of sufficient worth to warrant a mention.  But now we may share our profundity regards a winner!  Tincture, An Apocalyptic Proposition (TAAP) by Matthew M. Jordan, like so many successful salmon before it, beat it's little fins hard enough to reach The Promised Land - a review by us!  This is fantasy, not exactly post-apocalyptic, a genre we tired of many a moon past, and is really dark fiction, maybe weird fiction.  Whatever label is appied, TAAP is a commendable effort.

Here's his tag:

Rhamuel and the last of his family, Abranyah, travel their barren world, shack to shack, selling tinctures to keep a full belly and evading the dogmatists to keep their throats safe. Time has turned funny after The Whatever, an apocalyptic event that few remember and even fewer can explain, danger now as commonplace as the unrecognizable relics of war, and the madman Aphulan—along with an iron rule over his small township—may hold the answers. With a cure for The Sick and a passion to uncover what happened to their world, Rhamuel and Abranyah set off on a journey to the “other place,” the days before The Whatever, and ready themselves for a glimpse into what happened, and what was always meant to happen next.

NARRATION:   Very nice indeed.  We are unfamiliar with the voice, and no specific attribution was made as to whom it was.  We presume it was Mr. Jordan (hint hint, Mr. J - add attributions!).  As a solo read, there was sufficient articulation of voices between characters to distinguish amongs them.  Also, the anonymous narrator (oh how we admire anonymity) gave a spark, an energy to each main character which fit the personalities well.  There was a confidence in the narration which is surprising to find in a novice.  Very laudable.  We Would give 19 points for this category, about as high as a solo read may garner. 

EDITING/TECHNICAL:  There was one missed over-dub in a later episode, but just the one.  There were a few too-long-a-pauses, but, again, not enough to detract from the overall pace of the story.  Music outros could be a bit long.  Not that the music wasn't pleasing and well matched, it occasionally just ran a bit amok.  Sparse sound effects were bland and probably should have been deleted, but they  were not bad, just... melba toast.  We dole-out 15 points in this grouping.

ORIGINALITY OF STORY:  Back very much on track here, this is a unique tale.  We are unfamiliar with a similar yarn.  As original could be a bad thing, we must definitely state the originality was refreshing.  Several story-twists and elements caught us, scared veterans as we are,  completely by surprise.   This speaks well for the imagination of the author.  A wild and vivid imagination is such a gift, both from the Muse to the author and the author to us readers.  Thank you, kind sir!  An unreserved 20 points here.

QUALITY OF WRITING:  Ah, Mr. Jordan, if you're reading this, you may wish, at this juncture, to take a prescription tranquilizer, if available.  Wait twenty to thirty minutes, then read on.  The rest of you may proceed directly ahead - sedatives optional.  TAAP is more a story told more than a novel written.  This is not a bad thing, but it is not a good thing in and of itself.  Our ancestors sat around many a campfire at night listening to a bard tale tale like Beowulf and the like.  Good stuff!  Writing serious fiction is another art form and it is the one we pine-over.  That said, this is an expansive story with palpable characters who develop intriguing personalities.  Well done, good sir!  But technical flaws do hamper the effort.  There is an on going convolution to the story, scene out of time, if you will.  Think, for illustrative example, of Slaughter House Five.  Done well, this devise is wondrous.  In TAAP, we think the tool may have been over-employed, leading to a bit of jarring and miscomprehension.  The vagueries surrounding the beginning were almost enough to earn TAAP a WSRH.  But - for you dear reader - we persevered and found ourselves caught-up willingly in TAAP. 
Another Serious flaw was the dreaded Anticlimax.  The story came to a truly endless series of saw-toothed ending points, only to launch-forth into another riveting, poignant interlude.  We flash on the image of a fish dying slowly on the floor of a boat.  Will it ever stop flopping?  A final critique.  Mr. Jordan, please vary the word skull for the abused word brain-pan and pepper-in time as it is significantly less liberally.  That is all we'll say.  Zip.  We ladle-forth 10 points here. 

WOW FACTOR: There is clearly some in TAAP.  The prowess of the solo-narration is impressive.  The unbridled imagination of the setting the story is told in is most commendable.  We will always reward an author who spawns a new world and them leads us though it with loving care.  Just say no to zombies and vampires shall always be our motto, or battle cry.  TAAP stays light-years away from the cliche.  Finally, the music, which was a bit long at times, was spell-binding, well-matched, and a pleasure to hear.  You should be proud of yourself, Mr. Jordan!  14 wow-points.

EXTRA CREDIT:  They say in baseball, that if you watch long enough you'll see something you never have before.  And so it is here, a first in the annals of our saged reviews, a negative extra credit.  TAAP is the first to earn a subtraction.  We strike 3 points off the podcasts total for the blatant and unapologetic plagiarism of Fire Fly/Serenity.  We are huge fans of this body of scifi goodness.  But the dialogue in TAAR is clearly a photocopy of the jerky-western drawl of Malcolm Reynold and the rest of the Brown Coats.  It was a brilliant tool for Fire Fly, but when so overtly recycled, it shows a clear lack of originality.  As our close and personal friend Doctor Who has said, "Originality is cool!"

TOTAL:  75Well done, TAAP!


Their website is:  http://tincturestory.com/

1 comment:

  1. I just discovered your blog. Thank you for all your recommendations and reviews. I really love Tincture Story, just started the Season 1 finale and I really need to do a 2nd listen. Powerful, enticing stuff.

    ReplyDelete