As we have been forced to admit often and anon, we are nit-pickers and we often do not much fancy ourselves. We mean, what if we are gratuitously picking at nit? Hum? Well we don't know if such a thing is possible either - but there it is. Anyway, to our point, which we do indeed have.
It is with inconstant conviction that we must confess the Union of Renegades: The Rys Chronicles Book I (UOR) by Tracy Falbe has slipped quietly into a coma and we have hence removed it from listening-support. In other words - WSRH. The axe fell later in the story than most, around episode 15. Only The Leviathan Chronicles earned a WSRH later (say, perchance we are not chronicle lovers? Nah, silly coincidence). In common, both have some sparkling qualities which make they somewhat compelling. They both share outstanding production. They both failed in the story, which, as we harp-on time and again, needs be the real magic.
Ms. Falbe employed Dark Fire Productions and their near-incomparable Chris Snelgrove to do the job. Aside from Chris's annoying rendition of a French Canadian accent for two female characters (seriously, Chris, we need to talk) he is his usual fantastic. The WSRH would have been assigned had we read the book directly, most assuredly. As always, we wish to illustrate our issues, not merely sling-mud. The writing issues are both global and specific, and despite some attractive aspects of the book. For example, we commend Ms. Falbe on her imagination and unique insights. The story is diverse and the action complex. She demonstrates empathy for her characters - aside, lamentably, from the male lead.
Global issues are the construct of a plot based (we extrapolate from 15 episodes experience) on cooperation and 'union' between god-like magical beings and very pedestrian mortals. In the battle for Heaven, God and his angels did not call on man to form an alliance to defeat evil. Why would they? We would have brought veritable zero to the table. The same flaw barks-out at us in UOR.
When we say there are specific issues we, in the final assessment, could not overlook were, in essence, the lead male. He needed a lot of work to rise to the level of acceptable - passable. His fatal flaw is the he whines incessantly. If we wish to experience whiners, we need only go to work. They are there unavoidable. We do not relish spending our leisure time re-experiencing them. Examples. He gets pissed at his boss and quits at the worse of times because he is essentially an idiot and over-reacts. His girl friend is trapped on an ice mountain and scheduled to expire asap and he whines that he will not attempt a rescue until the children - who are safe in a nice castle - come too. He is told it is unsafe and imprudent to visit the girl friend when they first arrive at the castle. Instead of adhering to good advice from a supportive ally, he whines, that he wants to go to her. Oh yes, whining abounds.
Also, the male lead displays uncanny and consistently imbecilic decision-making. They flee into the wilderness. They are assaulted by ravenous wolves and horrific monsters yet they press-ahead in lieu of a wise retreat (no, Trac, even before the evil queen warped their minds and stole the child - even before that). His arguing with his new buddy about not rescuing his damsel in distress unless the kids come climb the mountain too. At most times, the lead's dialogue - his manner of speech - is stilted and unrealistic. People don't talk like he does and it detracts from the character's credibility. Other flaws abound, Why would the queen go to all the trouble of having said girl friend hauled-off to a mountain top to freeze to death when she could snap her fingers and the girl would burst into flames. It the tiresome old plot twist of setting up a death scenario in which if the villain had only just done the deed no escape would have been possible. Remember Batman and how he always extricated himself because the arch-villain left the scene too soon? Oh, and the cover. Ms. Falbe, a successful novel cannot be fronted with a picture of your neighbor on his way to a Ren-Faire. We notice subsequent covers are quite nice. Why start the series with the weakest cover?
Okay, enough said. We admire anyone with the conviction and insight to pen a work of fiction. We specifically admire Ms. Falbe's efforts. They do not fall too short of passable and she will doubtlessly improve. Hopefully that improvement will be offered in a series other than UOR sequels, as we are out in terms of that series. Even if Book II were brilliant, if we cannot get through Book I we would be in the dark, right? As we say, we are not here to impugn or pick-on Ms. Falbe. We simply, as always, wish only to offer our opinion in the for-what-it's-worth category while supplying specific examples. As a podcast, most listeners will enjoy it as it is so well produced and the story is, as we said, not too far off the mark. We, however, are not most listeners.
Honest, no seriously, honest reviews of podcasts on Podiobook.com, plus a few non-PB.com notables. We can save you time avoiding lesser podcasts and target you to the greats.
What's The Blog About, Alfie?
We are avid fans of literature, good literature. We prefer great writing, we'll settle for very good work, but we cannot abide anything less. We will stop reading a book if the author demonstrates mediocrity, writes incompetently, or, worse yet, simply loses our interest. That said, we will always give you our honest opinions about the books we've listened to on Podiobooks.com. We'll tell you why the great ones are great, and why the forgettable ones should be avoided.
We hope, when we've reviewed enough, you will come to this blog to see if a particular book is worthy of your time. We plan to be frank. You have come here to elicit our opinion and we shall not disappoint. Additionally, we hope this blog becomes a resource for PB.com authors to read honest and objective reviews of their efforts; no smoke blown-up the butt at any time. We have observed over time that reviews left on an author's site or iTunes are basically of two types. The first is the pie-eyed-hyperbolic-praise version of a review by a real fan. While excellent for the ego of said author, this form of assessment aids neither the potential listener nor the writer's development. The second type is the snarky-hit-and-run-slap-in-the-face negative review which may contain the kernel of an insight, but is actually significantly less valuable than the first type. Ours will be decidedly neither polar extreme. We will be as fair and complete as possible. An unavoidable off-shoot, indeed a desirable off-shoot, the clever reader will quickly appreciate is that we will undoubtably be squewering a few sacred-cows. If that happens, please keep in mind the fable of The Emporer's New Clothes and the fact that we would not review them in a less-than-stellar manner if they did not deserve it.
Our reviews are not placed on PB.com, iTunes, or any other public site. We do not wish to embarrass or ridicule any particular authors. Many of the authors are our friends, or at least were up till they read our review. We dearly appreciate that each PB.com author has poured their creative guts out for all to see with very little chance of monetary reward. This is not easy. We will not generally say anything but positives on public sites as we, in our alter ego, want the authors, even the poor ones, to have their moment in the bright-shiny sun. At the very least we want them to be happy little fish in their little ponds.
Finally a term defined, a dreaded term, one you wish never to see, one which strikes despair in the heart of any author - WSRH. This is short for "We Stopped Reading Here". Background. Our less than sainted father was a college English professor. When grading essays and term papers, especially freshman courses, we observed him many a cruel time to slash across the page with his red pen. Just below the horrific line, he would write, "I stopped reading here... F." Clearly, papa was a professor, not an editor, so he was an I while we are, well, a we. Hence, ISRH transforms into WSRH. However you begin it, it is not a good thing. Avoid writing something which earns WSRH, you will not be happy with yourself.
Your comments on our comments are most welcome. You may be as frank as we are. Contrary opinions, supported by rational argument not finger-wagging, will help the prospective PB.com readers find the books which are right for them. Bottom line: our comments plus your comments, along with author rebuttals, will in the end benefit us all, and help PB.com listeners choose wisely.
Based on the success of this blog, we have started a Forum where you can share your insights and reviews. The more information and discussion, the better informed we will all be.
We hope, when we've reviewed enough, you will come to this blog to see if a particular book is worthy of your time. We plan to be frank. You have come here to elicit our opinion and we shall not disappoint. Additionally, we hope this blog becomes a resource for PB.com authors to read honest and objective reviews of their efforts; no smoke blown-up the butt at any time. We have observed over time that reviews left on an author's site or iTunes are basically of two types. The first is the pie-eyed-hyperbolic-praise version of a review by a real fan. While excellent for the ego of said author, this form of assessment aids neither the potential listener nor the writer's development. The second type is the snarky-hit-and-run-slap-in-the-face negative review which may contain the kernel of an insight, but is actually significantly less valuable than the first type. Ours will be decidedly neither polar extreme. We will be as fair and complete as possible. An unavoidable off-shoot, indeed a desirable off-shoot, the clever reader will quickly appreciate is that we will undoubtably be squewering a few sacred-cows. If that happens, please keep in mind the fable of The Emporer's New Clothes and the fact that we would not review them in a less-than-stellar manner if they did not deserve it.
Our reviews are not placed on PB.com, iTunes, or any other public site. We do not wish to embarrass or ridicule any particular authors. Many of the authors are our friends, or at least were up till they read our review. We dearly appreciate that each PB.com author has poured their creative guts out for all to see with very little chance of monetary reward. This is not easy. We will not generally say anything but positives on public sites as we, in our alter ego, want the authors, even the poor ones, to have their moment in the bright-shiny sun. At the very least we want them to be happy little fish in their little ponds.
Finally a term defined, a dreaded term, one you wish never to see, one which strikes despair in the heart of any author - WSRH. This is short for "We Stopped Reading Here". Background. Our less than sainted father was a college English professor. When grading essays and term papers, especially freshman courses, we observed him many a cruel time to slash across the page with his red pen. Just below the horrific line, he would write, "I stopped reading here... F." Clearly, papa was a professor, not an editor, so he was an I while we are, well, a we. Hence, ISRH transforms into WSRH. However you begin it, it is not a good thing. Avoid writing something which earns WSRH, you will not be happy with yourself.
Your comments on our comments are most welcome. You may be as frank as we are. Contrary opinions, supported by rational argument not finger-wagging, will help the prospective PB.com readers find the books which are right for them. Bottom line: our comments plus your comments, along with author rebuttals, will in the end benefit us all, and help PB.com listeners choose wisely.
Based on the success of this blog, we have started a Forum where you can share your insights and reviews. The more information and discussion, the better informed we will all be.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment