What's The Blog About, Alfie?

We are avid fans of literature, good literature. We prefer great writing, we'll settle for very good work, but we cannot abide anything less. We will stop reading a book if the author demonstrates mediocrity, writes incompetently, or, worse yet, simply loses our interest. That said, we will always give you our honest opinions about the books we've listened to on Podiobooks.com. We'll tell you why the great ones are great, and why the forgettable ones should be avoided.

We hope, when we've reviewed enough, you will come to this blog to see if a particular book is worthy of your time. We plan to be frank. You have come here to elicit our opinion and we shall not disappoint. Additionally, we hope this blog becomes a resource for PB.com authors to read honest and objective reviews of their efforts; no smoke blown-up the butt at any time. We have observed over time that reviews left on an author's site or iTunes are basically of two types. The first is the pie-eyed-hyperbolic-praise version of a review by a real fan. While excellent for the ego of said author, this form of assessment aids neither the potential listener nor the writer's development. The second type is the snarky-hit-and-run-slap-in-the-face negative review which may contain the kernel of an insight, but is actually significantly less valuable than the first type. Ours will be decidedly neither polar extreme. We will be as fair and complete as possible. An unavoidable off-shoot, indeed a desirable off-shoot, the clever reader will quickly appreciate is that we will undoubtably be squewering a few sacred-cows. If that happens, please keep in mind the fable of The Emporer's New Clothes and the fact that we would not review them in a less-than-stellar manner if they did not deserve it.

Our reviews are not placed on PB.com, iTunes, or any other public site. We do not wish to embarrass or ridicule any particular authors. Many of the authors are our friends, or at least were up till they read our review. We dearly appreciate that each PB.com author has poured their creative guts out for all to see with very little chance of monetary reward. This is not easy. We will not generally say anything but positives on public sites as we, in our alter ego, want the authors, even the poor ones, to have their moment in the bright-shiny sun. At the very least we want them to be happy little fish in their little ponds.

Finally a term defined, a dreaded term, one you wish never to see, one which strikes despair in the heart of any author - WSRH. This is short for "We Stopped Reading Here". Background. Our less than sainted father was a college English professor. When grading essays and term papers, especially freshman courses, we observed him many a cruel time to slash across the page with his red pen. Just below the horrific line, he would write, "I stopped reading here... F." Clearly, papa was a professor, not an editor, so he was an I while we are, well, a we. Hence, ISRH transforms into WSRH. However you begin it, it is not a good thing. Avoid writing something which earns WSRH, you will not be happy with yourself.

Your comments on our comments are most welcome. You may be as frank as we are. Contrary opinions, supported by rational argument not finger-wagging, will help the prospective PB.com readers find the books which are right for them. Bottom line: our comments plus your comments, along with author rebuttals, will in the end benefit us all, and help PB.com listeners choose wisely.

Based on the success of this blog, we have started a Forum where you can share your insights and reviews. The more information and discussion, the better informed we will all be.

Saturday, February 12, 2011

More WSRH's - Pity

Very briefly, a couple of WSRH's which earn the label, unfortunately.  Neither is by any means bad, but equally, neirther is good.

STORM OVER WARLOCK:  This is a reading of an old Andre Norton scifi effort.  The story is just too dated to fly in this day-and-age.  The production is fine, it is just the story itself that will leave you yawning.

Heritage and Empire by Tom R Baynham:  We listened to the first episode and a half.  Nothing interesting happened.  There were characters and some were developed in some detail.  The details sounded uninteresting and the uninteresting aspects of the characters were really expanded upon.  We learned a lot about a protagonist soldier who promised to be uninteresting.  The emerging plot line promised to be uninteresting.  We lost interest - WSRH.

The Little Dragons byRowan Starsmith: We made it through one and a half episodes.  We were on the edges of our seat, riveted, seriously transfixed.  We were, it turns out, waiting for something to happen.  It did not.  Writing is such a perverse medium.  Good writing goes unnoticed, and bland writing sells like warm sweet pancakes.  There was in TLD's the standard wise-old woman, the cheese and bread, the search for old knowledge, healers, dragons, and magic herbs, and Frodo, and a magic ring, and Gandolf the wizard, and this evil spider... wait, no, we're mixing up the tired old stock elements.  We hate to, and wish it were never necessary to, lambaste neophytes for their efforts.  They worked hard, invested a lot of time, and offered-up their product for free.  That said, free is sometimes too much to pay.  The Little Dragons sure as heck sounded like a templated, stock, touchy-feely version of so many other rote stories, that we were amazed anyone still releases them

No comments:

Post a Comment